News & Updates

  • non image
    Fred Knapp was nominated by Governor Christie to be the next Morris County Prosecutor. The position requires confirmation by the New Jersey Senate. It is a five year term that Fred will serve starting upon confirmation.

    Learn More

  • non image
    On June 9, 2011, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision in Donaldson, et al v. DuPont Chambers Works. This decision, issued by a four-two majority (with Justice Rivera-Soto abstaining), significantly eases the burden for employees seeking front and back pay damages under the New Jersey’s Conscientious Protection Act (CEPA). The Donaldson case involved the plaintiff who allegedly suffered retaliation after complaining about alleged safety violations in the workplace. The alleged reprisals included false accusations of misconduct, negative performance…

    Learn More

  • non image
    By: Stephen E. Trimboli, Esq. The Law Journal reported on this case on January 14, 2011. On January 13, 2011, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, issued its decision in Morris County Sheriff’s Office v. Morris County PBA, Local 298. The Court addressed the question whether a public employer may “eliminate previously-tolerated featherbedding.” Emphatically reversing a Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) decision to the contrary, the Court held that the managerial prerogative to “spend public funds wisely” and…

    Learn More

  • non image
    By James T. Prusinowski The following was published in the New Jersey Law Journal on November 29, 2010. Businesses are constantly being presented with opportunities to negotiate contractual relationships with clients, vendors, service providers and employees. Whenever new contracts are established, the parties should determine how to resolve a dispute which may arise regarding the document. There are several dispute resolution forums. The two most commonly utilized for contract disputes are the courts and arbitration. Arbitration itself is a creature…

    Learn More

  • non image
    By Stephen E. Trimboli In Nino v. The Jewelry Exchange, Inc., et al., the Third Circuit refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between an employer and an individual employee, finding the agreement to be both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. “Procedural unconscionability” looks to “the process by which an agreement is reached and the form of {the} agreement, including the use therein of fine print and convoluted or unclear language.” A contract is substantively unconscionable when the contract contains “terms unreasonably…

    Learn More

Testimonials